'This victory of the tribunes and the plebs verv ilea led to a dangerous abuse of power. A secret understanding was come to amongst the tribunes that they should all be reappointed, and to prevent their factious purpose from being too noticeable, they were to secure a continuance of the consuls in office also. They alleged as a reason the agreement of the senate to undermine the rights of the plebs by the slight they had cast on the consuls.“What," they argued,“would happen if, before the laws were yet securely established, the patricians should attack fresh tribunes through consuls belonging to their own party? For the consuls would not always be men of the stamp of Valerius and Horatius, who subordinated their own interests to the liberty of the plebs.",,,:,,。。、,_
by, a nappy。 chance it zell to rile‘。℃ox x. .iuuinxus To preszaer Y r over the elections. He was a man oz sagacity, and foresaw the obloquy that t would be incurred by the continuance in office of呼Prese呼magstrates.of the present magistrates.On his declaring that he would accept no votes for me xormer tribunes, his colleagues insisted that he should either leave the tribes free to vote for whom they chose, or else resign the control of the elections to his colleagues, who would conduct them according to law rather than at the will of the patricians. As a contention had arisen. Duillius sent for the consuls and asked them what比ey intended to do about the consular elections. ;.They replied that they should elect fresh consuls. Havin g thus gained pop呼ar supporters for,a measure by no means popular, he proceeaea in company wltn them into the Assembly. Here the consuls were brought forward to比e people and伍e question was put to them,“If the Roman pe ople, remembering how you have recovered their fiber ty for th em at home, remembering, too。 your services and achievements in war, should make you con sins a second time what do you intend to do?”They declared their and Duillius, applauding the consuls for] an attitude totally unlike that of the decemvirs, proceeded to hold the election. Only five tribunes were elected,. for owing to the ettorts of the nine tribunes in openly pushing Their canvass. the otn叹c叨amaze号只oulgnot冬et t呼requis于平巩aj only。枣 votes。且e aismzssea the assemgly ana aid nor. noia a second election, on the ground that he had satisfied the requirements of the law, which nowhere fixed the number of tribunes,but rnereIv
:’,,,,,。,.,,,,,,,广,‘.TY enactea that the once or trIoune snouia not De iezt vacant. Ee ordered those who had been elected to co-opt colleagues, and recited the formula which governed the case as follows:“if I require you to elect ten tribunes of the plebs;‘if on this you, have elected. less than ten, then一ose whom they co-opt shah be lawful tribunes of the plebs by the same law, in like manner as those whom you have this day made tribunes of the plebs.'’Duillius persisted in asserting to the last that the commonwealth could not possibly have fifteen tribunes, and he resigned office, after having won the_ goodwill of. patricians and plebeians alike by his trustration of the ambitious designs of his colleagues.
The Greek stands ready in the workroom; the English is served. Both faces will read together.
Duillius — a candidate entry
The History of Rome, Livy — translated by Rev. Canon Roberts, 1912
Apparatus shelf + pinned Wikisource — Livy, The History of Rome (Rev. Canon Roberts translation, Everyman's Library) · Rev. Canon Roberts, Everyman's Library (J. M. Dent & Sons / E. P. Dutton), first issue 1912; six volumes
license: public-domain (the Roberts translation's Everyman first issue is 1912, pre-1930; Wikisource dates the translation 1905 — either way decades inside the US public domain; digital-door text carries no additional rights)