ἱστορίαι Historiai
Plut. Comparison of Theseus and Romulus 2 Comparison of Theseus and Romulus, Plutarch; served verbatim
Although Theseus and Romulus were both statesmen by nature, neither maintained to the end the true character of a king, but both deviated from it and underwent a change, the former in the direction of democracy, the latter in the direction of tyranny, making thus the same mistake through opposite affections. For the ruler must preserve first of all the realm itself, and this is preserved no less by refraining from what is unbecoming than by cleaving to what is becoming. But he who remits or extends his authority is no longer a king or a ruler; he becomes either a demagogue or a despot, and implants hatred or contempt in the hearts of his subjects. However, the first error seems to arise from kindliness and humanity; the second from selfishness and severity.

The Greek stands ready in the workroom; the English is served. Both faces will read together.

← Plut. Comparison of Theseus and Romulus 1 contents Plut. Comparison of Theseus and Romulus 3 →

Filed here — the addresses this episode attests; counted by the house’s first pass

Comparison of Theseus and Romulus, Plutarch — translated by Bernadotte Perrin, 1914–1926
Perseus Digital Library — Plutarch, Parallel Lives (Perrin translation) · Bernadotte Perrin, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press / William Heinemann, 1914–1926
license: public-domain (US: pre-1930 publication); Perseus digital edition CC BY-SA 4.0, attribution recorded in ops/corpus-staging/SOURCES.md